SCI论文小修答复信的写作技巧zjw642337320的博客,EditSprings,艾德思

       一般来说可以把答复信分成三部分, 即 List of Actions, Responses to Editor, Responses to Reviewers .第一部分List of Actions的作用是简明扼要的列出所有修改的条目,让编辑和审稿人在第一时间对修改量有个概念,同时它还充当着修改目录的作用,详见下面的例子.剩下 的两部分是分别对编辑和审稿人所做的答复,格式可以一样,按照"建议'－"argue'(如果有的话)－"修改'这样逐条进行.清楚醒目起见,可以用不同 字体分别标出,比如"建议'用italic,"argue'正常字体,"修改'用bold.下面举例说明各部分的写法和格式.

   编辑建议:请在修改稿中用双倍行距.

   审稿人1: 建议1:置疑论文的创新性,提出相似的工作已经被A和B做过. 建议2:算法表述不明确. 建议3:对图3的图例应 做出解释.

   审稿人2: 建议1:图2太小. 建议2:第3页有个错别字 .很多朋友在发表SCI论文是缺乏经验，这时候就需要专业的论文润色翻译服务了，一般我们会推荐editsprings服务更专业。

很显然,根据上面的答复策略,我们准备对除1号审稿人建议1之外的所有建议进行相应改动,而对采取 argue 为主的策略.答复如下:

List of Actions

LOA1: The revised manuscript is double spaced. LOA2: A discussion on novelty of this work and a comparison with A and B have been added in page 3. LOA3: A paragraph has been added in page 5 to further explain the algorithm ***. LOA4: Explanations of the legend of Figure 3 have been added in page 7. LOA5: Figure 2 has been enlarged. LOA6: All typos have been removed.

==================分页=======================

Responses to Editor

请在修改稿中用双倍行距.

We have double spaced the text throughout the revised manuscript, see LOA1.

==================分页=======================

Responses to Reviewers

To Reviewer 1:

建议1:置疑论文的创新性,提出相似的工作已经被A和B做过.

Thank you for pointing this out. A and B's research groups have done blablablabla. However, the focus of our work is on blablablabla, which is very different from A and B's work, and this is also the major contribution of our work. We have added the following discussion on this issue in our revised manuscript, see LOA2.

"blablablabla(此处把A和B的工作做一个review,并提出自己工作和他们的区别之处)'

建议2:算法表述不明确.

We have added the following discussion to further explain algorithm ***, see LOA3.

"blablablabla(此处进一步解释该算法)'

建议3:对图3的图例应做出解释.

We have added the following explanations of the legend of Figure 3, see LOA3.

"blablablabla(图3图例的解释)'

==================分页=======================

To Reviewer 2:

建议1:图2太小.

We have enlarged Figure 2, see LOA 4.

建议2:第3页有个错别字.

We have removed all typos, see LOA5.

注:合理掌握修改和argue的分寸.所谓修改就是对论文内容进行的修改和补充,所谓argue就是在回复信中对审稿人的答复.这其中大有论文可 做,中心思想就是容易改的照改,不容易改的或者不想改的跟审稿人argue.对于语法/拼写错误/某些词汇的更换/对某些公式和图表做进一步解释等相对容 易做到的修改,一定要一毫不差的根据审稿建议照做.而对于新意不足/创新性不够这类根本没法改的,还有诸如跟算法A,B,C,D做比较,补充大量实验等短 时间内根本没法完成的任务,我们则要有理有据的argue. 在Argue的时候首先要肯定审稿人说的很对,他提出的方式也很好,但本文的重点是 blablabla,跟他说的不是一回事.然后为了表示对审稿人的尊重,象征性的在文中加上一段这方面的discussion,这样既照顾到了审稿人的面 子,编辑那也能交待的过去.

摘自: [转载]关于文章的修改---推荐文章写作网站MedSci

更多科研论文服务，动动手指，请戳 论文润色、投稿期刊推荐、论文翻译润色、论文指导及修改、论文预审！

语言不过关被拒？美国EditSprings--专业英语论文润色翻译修改服务专家帮您！